American Football Forum - Forum per tutti gli appassionati di football americano a cui piace anche la figa

il contrattone, da dare al bidone

« Older   Newer »
  Share  
view post Posted on 28/12/2012, 12:42     +1   -1
Avatar

Siamo i figli della merda

Group:
EEEK EEEK EEEK
Posts:
7,708
Reputation:
-1
Location:
Il fango

Status:


trovate l'intruso

Zach Miller, Seahawks - $9,000,000 - Signed thru 2015
Vernon Davis, 49ers - $8,017,666 - Signed thru 2015
Marcedes Lewis, Jaguars - $7,200,000 - Signed thru 2015
Tony Gonzalez, Falcons - $6,900,000 - Signed thru 2012
Antonio Gates, Chargers - $6.584,400 - Signed thru 2015
Fred Davis, Redskins - $5,446,000 - Signed thru 2012
Jason Witten, Cowboys - $4,641,000 - Signed thru 2017
Jermichael Finley, Packers - $5,250,000 - Signed thru 2013
Greg Olsen, Panthers - $4,375,000 - Signed thru 2015
Anthony Fasano, Dolphins - $4,275,000 - Signed thru 2012
Heath Miller, Steelers - $4,274,000 - Signed thru 2012
John Carlson, Vikings - $4,000,000 - Signed thru 2016
Chris Cooley, Redskins - $3,900,000 - Signed thru 2013
Kellen Winslow, Seahawks - $3,800,000 - Signed thru 2014
Owen Daniels, Texans - $3,500,000 - Signed thru 2014
Dustin Keller, Jets - $3,052,500 - Signed thru 2012
Benjamin Watson, Browns - $2,880,000 - Signed thru 2012
Daniel Graham, Titans - $2,666,667 - Signed thru 2013
Rob Gronkowski, Patriots - $2,610,000 - Signed thru 2019
Brandon Pettigrew, Lions - $2,336,000 - Signed thru 2013



mr felpa sei una merda
 
Top
view post Posted on 28/12/2012, 14:13     +1   -1
Avatar

Advanced Member

Group:
EEEK EEEK EEEK
Posts:
7,071
Reputation:
+19
Location:
Crepacci

Status:


purtroppo dipende dai punti di vista... :plaxico:

prende quasi la metà di fasano... :plaxico:
 
Top
view post Posted on 28/12/2012, 15:00     +1   -1
Avatar

Advanced Member

Group:
Quando si parla di mockdraft non credo di avere rivali in Italia
Posts:
3,327
Reputation:
+20
Location:
dietro casa di Plaxico

Status:


penso sia ancora il contratto da rookie. aspetta 1 anno...
 
Top
view post Posted on 28/12/2012, 16:05     +1   -1
Avatar

Advanced Member

Group:
Spia
Posts:
6,421
Reputation:
-167
Location:
imola

Status:


tra l'altro non può essere che il suo contratto da rookie scada nel 2019, non esiste

il link di maria è una cazzata dai, diciamocelo
 
Top
view post Posted on 28/12/2012, 16:07     +1   -1
Avatar

Advanced Member

Group:
EEEK EEEK EEEK
Posts:
7,071
Reputation:
+19
Location:
Crepacci

Status:


CITAZIONE (sbiri71 @ 28/12/2012, 16:05) 
tra l'altro non può essere che il suo contratto da rookie scada nel 2019, non esiste

il link di maria è una cazzata dai, diciamocelo

io pensavo parlasse del contratto di fasano
 
Top
view post Posted on 28/12/2012, 16:28     +1   -1
Avatar

Advanced Member

Group:
Spia
Posts:
6,421
Reputation:
-167
Location:
imola

Status:


CITAZIONE (juan13 @ 28/12/2012, 16:07) 
CITAZIONE (sbiri71 @ 28/12/2012, 16:05) 
tra l'altro non può essere che il suo contratto da rookie scada nel 2019, non esiste

il link di maria è una cazzata dai, diciamocelo

io pensavo parlasse del contratto di fasano

forse tu capisci ancora meno di me, porca troia

certo che se fasano fosse sotto contratto fino al 2019 :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck:
 
Top
view post Posted on 6/1/2013, 07:51     +1   -1
Avatar

Messaggero del Felpa RT7Th Anno I PM

Group:
l'merda
Posts:
7,944
Reputation:
-33
Location:
Brescia

Status:


da quello che ricordo aveva rinnovato, faccio una ricerca

http://nyjetscap.com/Patriots/Gronkowski,%20Rob.php

TE Rob Gronkowski signed a 6 year extension worth $54 million dollars with the New England Patriots on June 8, 2012. Based on a report by Pro Football Talk the contract contains $13.17 million in full guarantees and $18 million in partial guarantees. Gronkowski received a signing bonus of $8 million. The Patriots hold a $10 million dollar option in 2016. Known base salaries are $540,000(2012), $630,000(2013), $3,750,000(2014), $4,750,000(2015), 2,250,000(2016), $4,250,000(2017), $8,000,000(2018), and $9,000,000(2019). Gronkowki will receive roster bonuses of $500,000 in 2016 and 2017 and $750,000 in 2018 and 2019 for every game in which he is active and $250,000 workout bonuses in each year of his contract.

sembra fatto apposta per essere ristrutturato a vita
 
Top
view post Posted on 11/7/2013, 09:36     +1   -1
Avatar

Senior Member

Group:
DUCETTO
Posts:
14,741
Reputation:
+36

Status:


A proposito di contratti, ho scovato questo sito che sembra esserne la Bibbia...

http://overthecap.com/

Roba interessante... :mmah:
 
Top
view post Posted on 15/7/2013, 08:19     +1   -1
Avatar

Senior Member

Group:
DUCETTO
Posts:
14,741
Reputation:
+36

Status:


Interessante... :mmah:

The Difficulty of Valuing and Comparing Contracts

Whenever a new contract pops up our immediate reaction is to compare it with someone else often in an effort to make it sound greater than it really is. The reality is that it is often very difficult to compare contracts and one or two numbers is never going to paint the real picture. There are many factors that come into play with a deal and you may often come up with two answers based on how you decide to value a contract. I can safely say that Aaron Rodgers contract is worth far more money than Joe Flacco’s, but I can also safely say that Flacco’s deal is far more player friendly and has a higher likelihood of being earned. While I’m as guilty as anyone with the comparisons I do try to paint a complete picture of contract comparisons. With Ryan Clady’s contract being the latest “biggest deal” I thought it was worth walking through some of the comparison difficulties.

New Money vs Total Money
This is the most difficult concept to work into contract comparisons. Contract extensions for the most part are contracts signed that have time remaining on the contract, often one year and sometimes more. When we value a deal we report the new money in the contract. To calculate new money you add together the yearly cash flows of the entire deal (for a 5 year extension with 1 year remaining that would be 6 years) and subtract out of that the cash flow component of the old contract. When we report on items like three year totals we are really adding many more years than three and subtracting the old money from the deal.
But is that fair? Take Joe Thomas for example as he is the most likely comparison to Clady. His three year “new money” total is $42 million. Clady’s deal can’t compare with that, but Thomas’ take is over a 4 year period. His actual three year salary on the total contract is $38.9 million. Again that is more than Clady but it’s much closer. In order to really put the “new” money valuations in perspective you have to look at contract structure which we will touch on in a bit.

Length of Contract
The initial comparisons of deals often come in terms of annual value per year and guaranteed salary. But there are major differences in those numbers based on years. APY can be misleading. Is the deal frontloaded? Is it backloaded? Do the additional years bring up the value or diminish the value. The great player contracts have backend numbers that diminish the value which we can calculate by items such as percent paid out over x amount of years or APY per each year. Thomas’ deal fits into this category and so should Clady’s. The great team deal has backend salary that artificially inflates the APY, an example of which was D’Brickashaw Fergusons contract with the Jets.
Guarantees can also be misstated. I like to look at guarantee per year or percent guaranteed more than the total guarantee. If I am giving up 7 years of my career to a team I need to be compensated for it. Thomas’ contract contained a whopping $44 million in guarantees, but that is on a 7 year deal. On a per year basis that is $6.28 million. On a percentage basis its 54.6%. If we just take into account potential full guarantees those numbers reduce. With a reported $33 million in guarantees on a 5 year deal Clady’s guarantee is as high as $6.6 million a year and 62.9% of the total contract. Now which sounds better?
You can take it a step further as well and factor in life earnings. Assuming players complete their deals how old will they be when they can re-sign. Clady will be 32 when he re-enters free agency. Thomas will be 35. Who has a better chance of earning another deal? Clearly the 32 year old. If the cap ever increases maybe Clady can make up that additional money Thomas received in his contract.

Contractual Structure
It is also important to take into consideration what happens if the player is not a great player over the life of the deal. Things change rapidly in the league and a deal that offers as much protection to the player as possible may be worth more than the deal with little protection that is valued higher. I often like to look at deals in terms of “virtual” guarantees, the point at which the salary cap implications begin to favor the release of the player. I tend to look at a few items when it comes to determining what is the true value of the contract.
Cap Savings- This is your very basic cap charge minus dead money in a given a year. Once it turns positive leverage goes from the player to the team and makes releasing the player more likely.
CSC Ratio- This calculation I use is the cap savings plus the cash savings divided by a players cap charge. I consider this to be a measurement of overall worth to a team to cutting a player. Remember a contract has both a cash and a cap component when you cut a player you save cash and may save or lose cap space. If the number is greater than the cap charge a team has reason to release.
Replacement Cost- While it is impossible to project this number ahead of time it puts more depth to the cap savings. This can be calculated by taking the cap savings of a release and subtracting out what cost a replacement player is. If you only save $2 million but the cost of a replacement is $5 million in cap dollars it is likely not worth cutting the player unless the cash component is that significant.
These are all important items to look at especially when we look at new money deals and seeing just how long those “new” years will really run. By agreeing to early extensions your contract structure is going to be much weaker than a newly signed deal.

Incentive Structures
This is often another big portion of confusion with a deal. We saw that tonight with Clady where the deal was originally reported as $57.5 million only to quickly learn that number included $5 million in potential escalators. Until earned we should always value at the base value of the contract. That $57.5 figure is likely important to Clady because it gives them a chance to reach the same APY as Thomas. The problem with that and as its being reported is that Thomas deal also contains $3.5 million in escalators, which , if earned, make his deal impossible to match.
With these escalators in place the details of earning them becomes important. Thomas’ are easier to earn because they are tied to Pro Bowls rather than All Pro nods, which is the condition of Clady’s. But Thomas’ seem to be tied to making Pro Bowls very late in his contract, which could be very difficult. Clady’s are reported to be available in tiers for each season and since his deal is only 5 years has more of a likelihood of actually being earned and paid.

Summary
These are just a few of the items that make comparisons difficult. It’s never as black and white as we like to make it seem when we quickly compare contracts, which is the best that can be done in 140 characters or a quick Sportscenter soundbite discussing how historic a contract is. With that in mind we will do our best when Clady’s details are made public to do as good a comparison as possible with the other big money deals on the market and try to determine just how much of the deal he will like see and when Denvers options to move on really begin.
 
Top
view post Posted on 26/7/2013, 13:59     +1   -1
Avatar

Senior Member

Group:
DUCETTO
Posts:
14,741
Reputation:
+36

Status:


Minkia Matty Ice... :mapor:

Ryan's five-year, $103.75 million contract extension.
Rapoport reported that Ryan receives $59 million guaranteed and $63 million in the first three years.
That puts him right near the top of the quarterback pay grade over the next three years, although his per-year average over the next six years overall comes in below Flacco, Aaron Rodgers, Peyton Manning and Drew Brees (but ahead of Matthew Stafford and Tony Romo)
 
Top
view post Posted on 4/9/2013, 12:12     +1   -1
Avatar

Senior Member

Group:
DUCETTO
Posts:
14,741
Reputation:
+36

Status:


Geno Atkins, DT, Bengals: 55 milioni per 5 anni di cui 22 garantiti nei prossimi 6 mesi.

Brian Cushing, LB, Texans, 55 milioni per 6 anni di cui 21 garantiti.
 
Top
view post Posted on 4/8/2014, 17:14     +1   -1
Avatar

Senior Member

Group:
DUCETTO
Posts:
14,741
Reputation:
+36

Status:


E che anello sia. :lollo:

Bengals reach six-year extension deal with Andy Dalton

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/...th-andy-dalton/
 
Top
view post Posted on 4/8/2014, 19:19     +1   -1
Avatar

Venite pure avanti, voi con il naso corto...

Group:
Ass Rusher
Posts:
13,781
Reputation:
+5
Location:
Bologna

Status:


CITAZIONE (Ocho Cinco @ 4/8/2014, 18:14) 
Bengals reach six-year extension deal with Andy Dalton

CENTOQUINDICIMILIONI
Il seppuku con i Bidone è nulla in confronto, qui si rischia di dover cambiare il numero pure all'emoticon

:duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck:
:duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck:
:duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck:
:duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck:
:duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck:
:duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck: :duck:


:patpat:
 
www  Top
view post Posted on 6/8/2014, 11:03     +1   -1
Avatar

Senior Member

Group:
DUCETTO
Posts:
14,741
Reputation:
+36

Status:


Alla fine non è così malaccio...

TqzsHVp
 
Top
view post Posted on 6/8/2014, 19:34     +1   -1
Avatar

Venite pure avanti, voi con il naso corto...

Group:
Ass Rusher
Posts:
13,781
Reputation:
+5
Location:
Bologna

Status:


CITAZIONE (Ocho Cinco @ 6/8/2014, 12:03) 
Alla fine non è così malaccio...

Una costosissima chiavica, ma voi siete contenti così

:okok:
 
www  Top
180 replies since 28/12/2012, 12:42   1419 views
  Share